Jump to content

The American Politics Thread!

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I can see the Trump supporters are as delusional as Trump here. Posting a bunch of fake conspiracy theories is pretty pathetic, but Trump knew he could manipulate his voters into this charade.  

I find it hilarious how Trumpsters (and Republicans in general) are just so used to cheating and bullying their way through life, that they simply can't fathom that 75 million Americans voted against

Me waiting for this groundbreaking evidence that has been posted about in this thread for well over a month that's going to win a court case and change everything.

Posted Images

9 minutes ago, ButterflyEffect said:

Glad everyone came back, I was starting to think the Republicans on here were being a little quiet today.

It was nice while it lasted.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Nutterbutter said:

You saw it in 2016 from liberals all over the web and it was hilarious. Trump hasn't lost, yet. PA violated the constitution when it's state supreme court ruled it could count votes recieved after 8pm, Nov. 3rd. This will go to the SCOTUS and there it will be decided. You can cheer and clap, but Trump is still president and it's not over even if creep Joe gets to 270 before Trump. There was a reason Trump said "stop counting" I know you like to think everything Trump says comes from him, but he's got a lot of advisors and Lawyers who are smarter than you.

I definitely never saw that cultistly schizophrenic-tier behavior in the aftermath of 2016.

 

They've lost every case so far, and there's very much a limit to how much advisors and lawyers can help, since the facts do not favor the suits. Even if they were to rule any sort of way - the courts cannot void votes counted after a certain date, there is no difference between an in-person vote on the day of the election and a mail-in ballot postmarked the same day but received after in their systems. It's logistically not possible.

 

It's over. You'd have to void the results of at least 2 states, and there's simply no credible argument for it.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, sneaky said:

I'm not so sure. Bernie was my guy and I think he would be best for the country. But a lot of people are brainwashed by the inane socialist talk. Itswhy Biden lost so many votes in Miami. Trump branded Biden as a socialist and ta lot of the Cubans fell for it


Joe Biden lost 17% of the Cuban vote to Trump because of his association to  Bernie Sanders.

 

The reality is, most democrats are much more moderate economically than Bernie - and are much more liberal than Bernie socially.

 

tbh, I have come to the conclusion that Joe Biden was the only democrat that was going to be able to beat Trump. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, bills_guy said:

I definitely never saw that cultistly schizophrenic-tier behavior in the aftermath of 2016.

 

They've lost every case so far, and there's very much a limit to how much advisors and lawyers can help, since the facts do not favor the suits. Even if they were to rule any sort of way - the courts cannot void votes counted after a certain date, there is no difference between an in-person vote on the day of the election and a mail-in ballot postmarked the same day but received after in their systems. It's logistically not possible.

 

It's over. You'd have to void the results of at least 2 states, and there's simply no credible argument for it.

 

Not over, by a long shot.  A person is genius, at an IQ of 140, and above.   Trump has an IQ of 159. With that said, while Biden is looking for his marbles, your president, has been playing 5D Chess, since before he ran for election, last time.  The absolute brilliance, of what is taking place, as I write this ... is  going to blow minds. There is a reason, why it is taking so long. And that .... is all I will say, for right now

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, mercfan3 said:


Joe Biden lost 17% of the Cuban vote to Trump because of his association to  Bernie Sanders.

 

The reality is, most democrats are much more moderate economically than Bernie - and are much more liberal than Bernie socially.

 

tbh, I have come to the conclusion that Joe Biden was the only democrat that was going to be able to beat Trump. 


Trump was a beatable candidate and I think there were many different molds of Democratic personalities which would have taken him down. However none of the options presented to the party were overly strong....of those, Biden was clearly the best choice. Bernie is too polarizing of a candidate to be doing as well as Biden is. Centre-leaning moderates would likely rather vote Trump (the poison you know) rather than the "radical far left" of Bernie. Nothing in Bernie Sanders platform is overly crazy from a worldwide perspective, but the United States lags well behind the rest of the world. Millennials and Gen Z'ers may like what Bernie is saying, but you'd never get your parents on board. Guess which group makes up the majority of the vote in the USA? 

Maybe in 15 years you guys will be ready to think outside the American box. Until then Biden is the best you get.

Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, bills_guy said:

I definitely never saw that cultistly schizophrenic-tier behavior in the aftermath of 2016.

 

They've lost every case so far, and there's very much a limit to how much advisors and lawyers can help, since the facts do not favor the suits. Even if they were to rule any sort of way - the courts cannot void votes counted after a certain date, there is no difference between an in-person vote on the day of the election and a mail-in ballot postmarked the same day but received after in their systems. It's logistically not possible.

 

It's over. You'd have to void the results of at least 2 states, and there's simply no credible argument for it.

You are wrong. I'm telling you the supreme court is all ready looking into PA supreme courts ruling that violated the constitution which states only state legislators can change the election parameters, not judges of the state. Even if Trump's legal team fails with 100 suits, this is already before the SCOTUS. I'll remind everyone that Biden accused Clarence Thomas of being a rapist. The Democrats accused Kavanaugh of being a gang rapist and then called Barrett a racist because she adopted two black kids. 

Roberts who once sat in the middle of 9 judges on the supreme court and was once the deciding vote siding many times with liberals has been neutered. Under PA state law 2019 section 77 votes can not be received after 8pm on the day of elections. Guess who now sits in the middle and writes all the legal findings?

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Nutterbutter said:

You are wrong. I'm telling you the supreme court is all ready looking into PA supreme courts ruling that violated the constitution which states only state legislators can change the election parameters, not judges of the state. Even if Trump's legal team fails with 100 suits, this is already before the SCOTUS. I'll remind everyone that Biden accused Clarence Thomas of being a rapist. The Democrats accused Kavanaugh of being a gang rapist and then called Barrett a racist because she adopted two black kids. 

Roberts who once sat in the middle of 9 judges on the supreme court and was once the deciding vote siding many times with liberals has been neutered. Under PA state law 2019 section 77 votes can not be received after 8pm on the day of elections. Guess who now sits in the middle and writes all the legal findings?

they allowed a 3 day extension https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2020/10/pa-mail-ballots-republican-voters-donald-trump/

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, FrogLenzen said:

 

 

 

Well ... when it is clear, who the true winner is (after all legal votes are counted), all i's are dotted, and t's are crossed, then ... yes. But until then, let's get to the truth of the matter  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mercfan3 said:


Joe Biden lost 17% of the Cuban vote to Trump because of his association to  Bernie Sanders.

 

The reality is, most democrats are much more moderate economically than Bernie - and are much more liberal than Bernie socially.

 

tbh, I have come to the conclusion that Joe Biden was the only democrat that was going to be able to beat Trump. 


Most people weren’t voting for Biden, as much as they were voting against Trump. Bernie would have certainly lost big, but there are a number of Democrats who would have come out on top. 
 

I cast my vote for Trump, but it was more of a vote against Biden-Harris.  Both candidates were awful. 

Edited by TeamAudra
Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, bswanson said:


I doubt it will make a difference, but there is a new order tonight. At the very least, we’re going to have recounts in multiple states. I’m fine with this because there does need to be more oversight and changes in future elections to avoid messes like we’re seeing in multiple states. I don’t care which party is at fault. Just fix it. 
 

 

Edited by TeamAudra
Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, bswanson said:

Ugh! To count, TO COUNT the votes, NOT receive the votes. PA has already said they found ballots after 8pm and it doesn't matter if they are postmarked on or before the election. The PA state law is unambiguous. They must be RECEIVED before 8pm on election day. The PA supreme court could have challenged that law as unconstitutional by sending it to their state legislators to change, but instead changed it themselves from unambiguous to ambiguous violating their state law and violating the U.S. constitution, which states only state legislators can rule on Federal election paramiters, time, place, ect.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Nutterbutter said:

You are wrong. I'm telling you the supreme court is all ready looking into PA supreme courts ruling that violated the constitution which states only state legislators can change the election parameters, not judges of the state. Even if Trump's legal team fails with 100 suits, this is already before the SCOTUS. I'll remind everyone that Biden accused Clarence Thomas of being a rapist. The Democrats accused Kavanaugh of being a gang rapist and then called Barrett a racist because she adopted two black kids. 

Roberts who once sat in the middle of 9 judges on the supreme court and was once the deciding vote siding many times with liberals has been neutered. Under PA state law 2019 section 77 votes can not be received after 8pm on the day of elections. Guess who now sits in the middle and writes all the legal findings?

I'm not wrong. The PA Supreme Court is literally who interprets the Pennsylvania state constitution. Federal courts have never, in American history, interpreted a state's constitution and made a ruling over it. That would be 100% unprecedent in the entirety of U.S. history. It would also, still, not allow Trump to win.

 

Also, even Fox News isn't covering for Trump's frivolous lawsuits.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, bills_guy said:

I'm not wrong. The PA Supreme Court is literally who interprets the Pennsylvania state constitution. Federal courts have never, in American history, interpreted a state's constitution and made a ruling over it. That would be 100% unprecedent in the entirety of U.S. history. It would also, still, not allow Trump to win.

 

Also, even Fox News isn't covering for Trump's frivolous lawsuits.

 

 

 Go hang out with JC. Together you might be able to figure it out. #batacathcare

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump fans are so pressed :giggle: Don't worry, I'm sure he can make some cameos on the Kardashians after he loses. Or in jail. Either way, he'll be where he belongs.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, psterina said:

The software, that was used in MI election, was used in other states  :mellow:   Yeah. This will not be over, anytime soon

 

 

So Florida is a swing state where Trump outperformed 2016. Trump also did better in Virginia and New York this time. Also, Trump lost Ga a state objectively rigged towards Republicans.  Read on how Brian Kemp was allowed to stay in charge of elections while running against stacy Abrams.  How come you aren't complaining about this so called faulty machine in those states? Why is there no fraud in those states? Did Republican controlled Ga allow fraud too?

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, psterina said:

 

Not over, by a long shot.  A person is genius, at an IQ of 140, and above.   Trump has an IQ of 159. With that said, while Biden is looking for his marbles, your president, has been playing 5D Chess, since before he ran for election, last time.  The absolute brilliance, of what is taking place, as I write this ... is  going to blow minds. There is a reason, why it is taking so long. And that .... is all I will say, for right now

 

😂🤪

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...